With the news broken that Progress Kentucky was behind the secret recording of a strategy meeting between Senator Mitch McConnell and his campaign staff, there are a few questions that remain.What happens to the people who made the tape?Jacob Conway with the Jefferson County Democratic Party says Progress Kentucky founder Shawn Reilly and then-volunteer Curtis Morrison made the recording. Reilly now has a lawyer, and he's throwing Morrison under the bus. After a press conference Thursday, WHAS11's Joe Arnold tweeted:
Atty for @smarkreilly : "Mr. Reilly is completely innocent of any criminal wrongdoing." @Team_Mitch #KySen
— Joe Arnold (@joearnoldreport) April 11, 2013
Atty for @ProgressKy's Shawn Reilly says he has provided material support & information to FBI in their efforts to locate Curtis Morrison
— Joe Arnold (@joearnoldreport) April 11, 2013
Atty for @ProgressKy's @smarkreilly : Curtis Morrison is - if anyone - guilty of criminal activity in this case @Team_Mitch #KySen
— Joe Arnold (@joearnoldreport) April 11, 2013
Atty for @ProgressKy's Shawn Reilly says he has provided material support & information to FBI in their efforts to locate Curtis Morrison
— Joe Arnold (@joearnoldreport) April 11, 2013
Reilly is admitting he was at the McConnell campaign headquarters, but that anything illegal was done by Morrison.Was it really illegal?Conway and other sources have said the recording was made in the hallway of an office building, through a ventilated door. Here's a picture:
Kentucky law describes eavesdropping as "to overhear, record amplify or transmit any part of a wire or oral communication of others without the consent of at least one party thereto by means of any electric, mechanical or other device." But Louisville criminal defense attorney Brendan Mcleod, says if the parties could be heard with the naked ear, then he doesn't believe that would be eavesdropping. "Now, if you had something that was super-sensitive and I guess, lower decibels, and you know that’s something that the human ear couldn't hear and the whole object of the meeting was that it was privacy and it wasn't to be heard or recorded and you used this device yeah that could probably be considered and fall under the guise of eavesdropping."
The eavesdropping law was written in the 1970s, so it doesn't reflect some of the newer technology. If charges are filed, this could be a very technical court case.
What does this mean for the U.S. Senate race?
Last month, when Progress Kentucky first gained national attention for a series of tweets about McConnell's wife, former labor secretary Elaine Chao, and her ethnicity, Morrison left the group.
Reporter Joe Sonka wrote Progress's obituary in LEO, saying the super PAC's demise would ultimately boost the "Ditch Mitch" movement:
Conway told NBC News that he came forward now to dissociate the group from the Democratic Party. But the upshot of the episode is that instead of a news cycle or two of pundits chewing over whether it’s fair game for the most powerful Republican in the U.S. to attack a would-be opponent for suffering from depression, the story becomes a scandal about a surreptitious bugging operation. This is the second time in two months that Progress Kentucky, a group whose entire existence seems geared toward taking down McConnell, has instead propped him up. With enemies like these, who needs friends?